Again, this is a database of licenses.
New York State Records
Whether the couple actually said "I Do" is not recorded here. The year listed for certain people's license is wrong; the database lists the year before they were married? Licenses were valid for several weeks.
- Bronx County Clerks' Office?
- new jersey board of marriage and family;
- divorce records kathleen grove steven grove.
- You are here;
- Public Records Search?
It is possible that some people could have applied for a license in December of one year, but married in January of the next year. The license year would match the application, not the ceremony. New York is very unusual in that the City and the State are two totally separate vital records jurisdictions. That data will also be released to the public, since it too should be in the public domain.
Make sure you sign up for our free e-mail mailing list to follow our progress on that, and our other records requests. I still can't find a person in this database, and I really think that they should be in there. What now? When in doubt, you should talk to the City Clerk's Office directly. Their copy of this database also includes information about the bride's and groom's dates of birth, while this one does not, and perhaps they can do a look-up on those fields for you to help you track down a stubbornly missing record.
Also note that the original handwritten ledger indices for the licenses, which were previously only available on microfilm, have now been digitally scanned and were put online in early In the event that you can't find someone in this text database, you may wish to look through those original index images instead.
Those index images are not text-searchable, but they're sorted by borough and by year, and then are arranged by quarter of the year, and then are listed alphabetically by surname, so they're not too difficult to use. Did you find this information useful? If so, please consider making a donation to Reclaim The Records , the non-profit organization who liberated this data through a Freedom of Information lawsuit, and who run this website. Learn more about what we do. Too many government agencies and archives have long treated genealogists as if we were asking them for a favor when we ask to see their records — our records — rather than recognizing their responsibilities to the public under the law.
Reclaim The Records is changing that. Our EIN is Start Your Free Search Online. Download the raw data for offline use This data was obtained from the New York City Clerk's Office through two separate New York State Freedom of Information lawsuits, one filed in mid for the portion and one in mid for the portion. XLS MB. Make a Donation to Reclaim The Records. Bride or Spouse 1 Given Name. Groom or Spouse 2 Given Name. License Year From. License Filed Bronx. Staten Island. Reset Search. Tips and Tricks All fields are optional , only fill out as much as you know.
Soundalike surnames and spelling variants are automatically searched. For example, a search for the surname Chang will also bring up results for Zhang and Chan , a search for Schwartz also finds Swartz , a search for Russo also finds Rousseau , etc.
Common nicknames are automatically searched, too. For example, a search for the given name Bill will also bring up results for William , Will , Billy , etc. Note that the soundalike name suggestions will not be as precise if you are using wildcards in your search. Marriage Licenses, This is a three-page occasionally four-page document set originally issued by the New York City Clerk's Office. Marriage Certificates, late 19 th century - This is a two-page document set originally issued by the New York City Health Department.
Domestic Partnerships, The NYC Department of Personnel began a partnership registry for city employees in August , and the City Clerk's Office began a formal registry for the general public in January XLS Microsoft Excel spreadsheet files, one file per borough except for Manhattan which was broken up into two files. Each spreadsheet file had multiple sheets of data within it, and each sheet had a maximum of 65, entries on it.
Daronco Courthouse entrance. The office is open Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays, from 8 a. Requesting a Legal Record by Mail. While we do not provide copies of full court files via mail, we will accommodate requests for specific legal records.
You are here
To request an unsealed legal record, please send a letter which contains as much of the following information as possible: index or file number, the name of the specific document you are searching for such as "a judgment", the name of the parties to the action, and the date the record was filed. Cash is not accepted and all fees must be included with your written request. Searching Our Records Online.
Visit Westchester Records Online to determine whether certain records are on file in the Office of the Westchester County Clerk and to view information about these records. This information is available for civil cases from to the present and for criminal cases from to present. Please call or email.
Legal Resources for Digital Media
You can probably imagine what went through our head when we read their letter with these demands. Here, New York was claiming that there was an unknown number of microfiche sheets per year but that the number was somehow exactly the same for each of the seventy-six years.
This was absurd, as of course the number of deaths in the state varied from year to year, and grew over time as the population increased, and sometimes had unusual spikes in the death rate as happened in the influenza pandemic. For the state to simply make a flat fee for each of the seventy-six years in question, even if that fee had been reasonable, was breaking the law all on its own. They did not provide any copies of estimates from vendors, nor the names of vendors, nor published price lists, nor did they ever provide some after we pressed them for details.
Thanks to a genealogist friend who happened to be in Albany and who took it upon herself to count up all the microfiche sheets of the death index at the library, we knew there were 1, microfiche sheets in total in the state death index, give or take the few sheets that had gone astray over the years. And they never apologized for it, even after they dropped that part of the demand when our attorney called them out on their behavior.
For reasons that defy explanation, when we filed a formal appeal of this FOIL request with the Department of Health on June 3, , the person to whom we appealed, who also worked for the Department, proceeded to deny our appeal. At that point, we had a choice to make. We could take the next step and take the case to trial, suing the state of New York. We would probably win, but it would be expensive, and there was no guarantee that we would win back attorneys fees even if we did win all the records.
In New York, the awarding of attorneys fees is left up to the discretion of the judge, and is a separate question from whether the records were wrongly being withheld. But we had another option. In all the months of fighting with the DOH for these records, our point person on the case had been their Records Access Officer, a woman whose name we will omit here but which can be easily determined from reading through our legal paperwork, which are all a matter of public record and all online.
She had been the person behind the lack of transparency on pricing, the ten-day exploding offer, the months of delays, and all of that. And as we were approaching the legal deadline of whether or not to pursue legal action against the state, we heard through the grapevine that this woman was suddenly no longer the Records Access Officer. In any case, she was now gone. This meant that instead of suing the state, we could try a different tactic.
Luckily, this new one was far more pleasant to deal with, and as far as we could see she did not do anything overtly illegal. At this point, it was nearing the end of In an effort to move things along, we asked the new Records Access Officer if we could bring in our own digitization vendor to do the scanning of the microfiche sheets they held, just to make it easier on the state and get these records copied already.
She replied that we could indeed hire our own vendor to do the scanning…with a few minor restrictions. And so on. Frustrated but persistent, we said yes to all these demands.go
We Want Our Records Back.
But can we just have the death index already? Well, no.
And that meant that we also had to wait while they discussed and approved the government funding to hire this archivist. So while we waited, we tried yet another tack to speed up this request, which was by now more than a year old.
County Clerk's Office | Washington County, NY - Official Website
Hey, remember how there are about eleven libraries in New York State where the public can use a copy of this microfiche? Can we maybe scan one of those copies instead of waiting for you guys in Albany to get an archivist to assess your copies? They claimed that the libraries are under the Department of Education, and to get access to their holdings, including these death index microfiche, we would have to file a FOIL request with the Department of Education instead of the Department of Health.
And then? Another bombshell dropped — but this time, a good one, or so it seemed, The Records Access Officer, on one of our many phone calls to her asking for a status update, suddenly let us know that the Department would be hiring a vendor to scan the vault copies.
But now it was all going to be handed to us for free? And a few months later, seventeen months after the original FOIL request had been filed, we finally received in the mail a small USB hard drive containing all the seventy-six years of scanned microfiche. Several months later, we found out why Reclaim The Records had never received a bill, or even an estimate, from the state itself or from the mysterious vendor who had scanned the microfiche sheets on behalf on the state.
The vendor turned out to be none other than Ancestry.